Management of Head Trauma.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a heterogenous spectrum of disease. It is essential to rapidly assess a patient's neurologic status and implement measures to prevent secondary brain injury. Intracranial hypertension, a common sequela of TBI, is managed in a tiered and systematic fashion, starting with the least invasive and moving toward the most invasive. TBI has long-lasting effects on patients and their families and represents a substantial financial and social influence on society. Research regarding the prognosis and treatment of TBI is essential to limit the influence of this widespread disease.

Utility of Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Detecting Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Falls on Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: Ground level falls in the elderly often lead to complications due to use of anticoagulants (ACs). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), immediate or delayed, is a feared consequence of such falls. The rate of delayed ICH (dICH) in patients taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet (AP) agents ranges from .6% to 6%. Patients on warfarin have a persistent rate of dICH, leading to implementation of routine repeat head CTs at our institution. This policy was extended to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aims to determine institutional incidence of DOAC-associated dICH. METHODS: With IRB waiver approval, we conducted a retrospective review of trauma evaluations for falls on DOACs from 2016 to 2018. We reviewed records for neurologic status, DOAC use, and results of initial and delayed head CTs. Exclusion criteria included initial GCS ≤14, new neurologic deficits, traumatic findings on initial CT, concurrent use of additional AC/AP, or absence of repeat head CT. RESULTS: Among 632 patients evaluated for falls on AC/AP therapy, 159 (25%) of patients were included in the review. The age range was 19-98 years old, with 99 females and 60 males. Half of the patients were on apixaban, with the rest on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Ten patients presented with GCS of 14. No delayed hemorrhages were detected in this population. CONCLUSION: The necessity of a repeat head CT in patients taking DOACs is debated in the literature. Our analysis failed to demonstrate any delayed hemorrhage in neurologically intact patients after head strike on DOAC, suggesting no indication for follow-up imaging in this group.

Current use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator in academic surgery: a mixed-methods study.

Background: This study aims to quantitatively assess use of the NSQIP surgical risk calculator (NSRC) in contemporary surgical practice and to identify barriers to use and potential interventions that might increase use. Materials and methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of surgeons at seven institutions. The primary outcomes were self-reported application of the calculator in general clinical practice and specific clinical scenarios as well as reported barriers to use. Results: In our sample of 99 surgeons (49.7% response rate), 73.7% reported use of the NSRC in the past month. Approximately half (51.9%) of respondents reported infrequent NSRC use (<20% of preoperative discussions), while 14.3% used it in ≥40% of preoperative assessments. Reported use was higher in nonelective cases (30.2% vs 11.1%) and in patients who were ≥65 years old (37.1% vs 13.0%), functionally dependent (41.2% vs 6.6%), or with surrogate consent (39.9% vs 20.4%). NSRC use was not associated with training status or years in practice. Respondents identified a lack of influence on the decision to pursue surgery as well as concerns regarding the calculator's accuracy as barriers to use. Surgeons suggested improving integration to workflow and better education as strategies to increase NSRC use. Conclusions: Many surgeons reported use of the NSRC, but few used it frequently. Surgeons reported more frequent use in nonelective cases and frail patients, suggesting the calculator is of greater utility for high-risk patients. Surgeons raised concerns about perceived accuracy and suggested additional education as well as integration of the calculator into the electronic health record.